Nerman Fatic vs Eduard Esteve Lobato Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
N. Fatic vs E. Esteve Lobato

Nerman Fatic

BIH

0

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

6'3" (191 cm)

Height

6'2" (188 cm)

214

C. Rank

841

191

Best Rank

271

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$74.0K

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Eduard Esteve Lobato

ESP

0

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

6'3" (191 cm)

Height

6'2" (188 cm)

214

C. Rank

841

191

Best Rank

271

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$74.0K

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Fatic 0 - 1 Lobato

They have played 2 sets in total, with Nerman Fatic winning 0 and Eduard Esteve Lobato winning 2. The last match between Eduard Esteve Lobato and Nerman Fatic was at the Italy F33 (Santa Margherita Di Pula), 23-10-2018, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Eduard Esteve Lobato getting the victory 7-5 6-1.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Fatic	0
Lobato	1

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1) Italy F33 (Santa Margherita Di Pula)(10-23-18)

Stats

Eduard Esteve Lobato

Nerman Fatic

N. Fatic vs E. E. Lobato H2H Profile

N. Fatic	Stats	E. E. Lobato
$73,995	Career Prize Money	$0
58.49% (403-286)	Career Total W/L	57.94% (332-241)
0	Clay	1
12	Titles	8
0	Total H2H Matches	1
0.00% (0-1)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

N. Fatic vs E. E. Lobato Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nerman Fatic has won 43.74% of points on their second serve, while Eduard Esteve Lobato has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nerman Fatic, in recent form, has won 45.50% of their opponent's second serve points, while Eduard Esteve Lobato has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.83% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Nerman Fatic has saved 53.51% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Eduard Esteve Lobato has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Nerman Fatic has won 75.00% of matches played (W/L 51/17), with Eduard Esteve Lobato winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Nerman Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 341/218), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/2). Eduard Esteve Lobato has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 313/217), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/1).
Player level: In the last year, Nerman Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.86% of matches (W/L 24/13), where as Eduard Esteve Lobato has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nerman Fatic winning 0 times and Eduard Esteve Lobato being victorious 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nerman Fatic winning 0 and Eduard Esteve Lobato winning 2.
The last match between Nerman Fatic and Eduard Esteve Lobato was at the Italy F33 (Santa Margherita Di Pula), 23-10-2018, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Eduard Esteve Lobato getting the victory 7-5 6-1.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:34:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nerman Fatic has played against opponents with an average rank of 345.6 while Eduard Esteve Lobato has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nerman Fatic has won 89% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Eduard Esteve Lobato has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Nerman Fatic has converted 34.78% of breakpoint opportunities, and Eduard Esteve Lobato has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Nerman Fatic vs Eduard Esteve Lobato Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

N. Fatic vs E. E. Lobato H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

N. Fatic	Stats	E. E. Lobato
0	H2H Matches Won	1
0	Sets Won	2
6	Games Won	13
1	Aces (Total)	3
7	Total Double Faults	0
1:34:0	Average Match Time	1:34:0
67% (48/72)	1st Serve %	67% (33/49)
63% (30/48)	1st Serve Win %	70% (23/33)
25% (6/24)	2nd Serve Win %	69% (11/16)
50% (1/2)	Break Pts Won %	56% (5/9)
31% (15/49)	Return Points Win %	50% (36/72)
0% (0/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

N. Fatic Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Helsinki Challenger - 03-11-2025
R1 Calvin HemeryC. Hemery	L	6-3 7-6(4)	Stats
M15 Bol - 20-10-2025
R2 Marko MiladinovicM. Miladinovic	L	7-6(2) ret.	Stats
R1 Antonio VoljavecA. Voljavec	W	6-2 6-3	Stats
Olbia Challenger - 13-10-2025
QF Hugo GrenierH. Grenier	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
R2 Carlo Alberto CaniatoC. Alberto	W	3-6 6-3 6-3	Stats

View All

E. E. Lobato Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Girona Challenger - 27-03-2023
Q3 Alvaro Lopez San MartinA. Lopez	L	6-7(4) 6-4 6-2	Stats
Q1 Alejandro Moro CanasA. Moro	W	2-6 6-3 7-6(2)	Stats
Valencia Challenger - 21-11-2022
Q3 Pablo Llamas RuizP. Llamas	L	3-6 6-4 0-1 ret.	Stats
Q1 Duje AjdukovicD. Ajdukovic	W	4-6 6-3 6-4	Stats
M15 Benicarlo - 07-11-2022
R2 Bruno Pujol NavarroB. Pujol	L	7-5 3-1 ret.	Stats

View All

N. Fatic vs E. E. Lobato Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

N. Fatic	Stats	E. E. Lobato
58.49% (403/286)	YTD Win/Loss	57.94% (332/241)
57.51% (888/656)	Sets Win/Loss	57.77% (740/541)
53.04% (7574/6706)	Games Win/Loss	53.87% (6216/5323)
51.19% (43/41)	Hard Win/Loss	40.54% (15/22)
61.00% (341/218)	Clay Win/Loss	59.06% (313/217)
43.18% (19/25)	Indoor Hard W/L	66.67% (4/2)
0.00% (0/2)	Grass Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
0.23	Aces Per Game	0.13
1568	Aces Total	724
0.22	Double Faults Per Game	0.12
1510	Total Double Faults	655
1:19:52	Average Match Time	1:2:33
509.43	Average Opponent Rank	568.46
66% (23679/35628)	1st Serve %	68% (15519/22976)
65% (15504/23679)	1st Serve Win %	65% (10093/15519)
48% (5733/11949)	2nd Serve Win %	50% (3739/7457)
47% (1961/4201)	Break Points Won % (Total)	48% (1380/2904)
43% (15552/35990)	Return Points Win %	44% (10492/23580)
20.00% (1/4)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
0.00% (0/1)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
40.00% (4/6)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
25.00% (3/9)	Main Tour W/L	0.00% (0/3)
52.91% (118/105)	Challenger W/L	50.79% (32/31)
63.24% (277/161)	Futures W/L	59.17% (300/207)
60% (394/661)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	61% (326/533)
0% (0/3)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	10% (1/10)
51% (79/156)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	47% (59/125)
54% (102/188)	Deciding Set Win %	54% (85/156)
88% (393/347)	1st Set Won, Won Match	86% (339/292)
11% (393/42)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	13% (339/44)
19% (296/57)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	18% (234/41)